Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834364›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2024

A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications.

Bhutada Sarita, Dahikar Samadhan, Md Zakir Hassan, Elena G Kovaleva

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhutada SaritaDepartment of Microbiology, Sanjivani Arts, Commerce and Science College, Kopargaon, India.
Dahikar SamadhanDepartment of Microbiology, Sanjivani Arts, Commerce and Science College, Kopargaon, India.
Md Zakir HassanDepartment of Technologies for Organic Synthesis, Institute of Chemical Technology, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Elena G KovalevaDepartment of Technologies for Organic Synthesis, Institute of Chemical Technology, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beneficial properties of probiotics have always been a point of interest. Probiotics play a major role in maintaining the health of Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT), a healthy digestive system is responsible for modulating all other functions of the body. The effectiveness of probiotics can be enhanced by formulating them with prebiotics the formulation thus formed is referred to as synbiotics. It not only improves the viability and stability of probiotic cells, but also inhibits the growth of pathogenic strains.

Indexed as

human healthintestinal disorders and encapsulationprebioticsprobioticssynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39834364
PMCPMC11743475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.