ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Concurrent common fungal networks formed by different guilds of fungi.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and Functional Responses of Root Endophytic Fungi to Fairy Ring Expansion in Alpine Meadows on the Tibetan Plateau.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microbial interactions mediate the fairy ring type effects on alpine meadow plant communities on the Tibetan plateau.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Decoding dark septate endophyte symbiosis: a functional and ecological perspective.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks-A climate-smart blueprint for agriculture.Plant communications · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic evidence of interspecies systemic resistance induction via common mycorrhizal networks.Mycorrhiza · 2025Article
- Evidence for common fungal networks among plants formed by a Dark Septate Endophyte in Sorghum bicolor.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.