ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Quality of registration and adherence to guidelines for blood management in CABG surgeries: a case study.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Quality of registration and adherence to guidelines for blood management in CABG surgeries: a case study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many hospitals, patients undergoing cardiac surgery receive a higher amount of blood products transfusions compared to other disciplines. Blood transfusion comes with risks and drawbacks, such as increased morbidity and mortality across different patient groups, and specifically patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and high costs. Patient Blood Management (PBM) practices focus on the application of evidence based medical and surgical concepts in order to preserve the patient's own blood. Unfortunately, studies suggest that only a small fraction of published guidelines are implemented and followed into daily clinical practicedue to clear guidance, concerns about risks, and lack of knowledge, interdisciplinary commitment or resources. The widespread adoption of electronic health record (EHR) offers the opportunity to improve clinical outcomes through use of decision support system to guide the healthcare providers through best practices and guidelines. Decision support systems can be active, data-based, patient-specific and act timely, and can be more useful that adding new clinical practice guidelines. This case study quantifies the quality of the data registration and provides the results for adherence to perioperative PBM guidelines for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures during a three-year period (2018 to 2020), in the St. Antonius hospital, a single heart center that performs over 10% of the total number of heart operations in the Netherlands. With this case study we identify some of the possible improvement factors for PBM in our center. We also quantify the impact of the quality of the registration in the EHR on the analysis results and on possible implementation of decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.