Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833873›Full record

ArticleBiological research2025

Exposure of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies to imidacloprid impairs larval development, promotes oxidative stress in pupae, and induces changes in the midgut of adult bees.

Daiani Rodrigues Moreira, Tuan Henrique Smielevski de Souza, Douglas Galhardo, Cinthia Leão Figueira, Samara Calvi Baulli, Breno Gabriel da Silva, Francieli das Chagas, José Washington Santos Oliveira, Jean Samel Rocha, Angélica de Souza Khatlab and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daiani Rodrigues MoreiraDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil. daianibiogeo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-6624
Tuan Henrique Smielevski de SouzaDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Douglas GalhardoDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Cinthia Leão FigueiraDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Samara Calvi BaulliDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Breno Gabriel da SilvaDepartment of Exact Sciences, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" - University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13418-900, Brazil.
Francieli das ChagasDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
José Washington Santos OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Jean Samel RochaDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Angélica de Souza KhatlabDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Eliane GasparinoDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de ToledoDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Adriana Aparecida Sinópolis GigliolliDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Maria Claudia Colla Ruvolo-TakasusukiDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetics and Cell Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 351071/2022-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bees are essential pollinators that contribute to maintaining biodiversity and increasing agricultural production. However, by foraging on agricultural crops, bees may become contaminated with compounds used for pest control. In this study, we exposed bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies to the insecticide imidacloprid (IMD) under field conditions to assess the occurrence of oxidative stress in larvae and pupae and investigate morphological changes in the fat body and midgut of larvae and midgut of adult bees. The apiary area was divided into three groups: control, commercial formulation containing IMD (Evidence

Indexed as

ImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOxidative StressAnimalsBeesLarvaPupaimidaclopridImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsFat cellsField exposureHoney beeRedox system

Identifiers

PMID39833873
PMCPMC11748266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.