Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833860›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

How do staff work in NHS hospital operations management meetings to support resilience in everyday service delivery? A qualitative study.

L Sutton, C Tarrant, J Willars, T Coats, M Simmonds, D Mclean, A Boyle, K Dreesbeimdiek, S Richter, A Oyedijo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

L SuttonSAPPHIRE Group, Population Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
C TarrantSAPPHIRE Group, Population Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
J WillarsSAPPHIRE Group, Population Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
T CoatsEmergency Medicine Academic Group, Cardiovascular Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
M SimmondsNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
D McleanNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
A BoyleCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
K DreesbeimdiekDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
S RichterCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
A OyedijoDepartment of Management, Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
D RolandSAPPHIRE Group, Population Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK. dr98@leicester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperations Management meetings in NHS hospitals provide an opportunity for operational and clinical staff to monitor demand and capacity and manage patient flow. These meetings play an important role in the achievement of resilient performance over time. However, little is known about the work that takes place within these meetings in the United Kingdom's National Health Service.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study observing 29 Operations Management meetings across three English hospitals between June and October 2023. The observations focused on: who was present; how meetings were organised and conducted; what data were used; how decision-making took place; and the types of work that were undertaken. We also conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with divisional leads and meeting chairs. A grounded theory analytic approach involved exploring the data in two sites to identify key themes, and then testing these themes through a third comparator site.

resultsWe identified the type and extent of work that took place in these meetings to maintain flow and enable resilient service delivery. Operations Management meetings provided an opportunity for staff to come together to engage in collective sense-making, to develop a shared mental model of the state of the hospital and to build a collective understanding of where action was needed. Review of centralised data, formally encoded and recorded in numerical form, played an important role, but staff also drew on local intelligence to make sense of and adapt to often pressurised situations. We identified three types of work: Sense-making and Interpretation, and Risk work (which together contributed to maintaining organisational function) and Maintaining morale (which supported individual staff resilience).

conclusionsThe work that went on in Operations Management meetings functioned to support organisational and individual resilience, through staff repeatedly sharing and assessing information on capacity and demand, taking action to address these continually changing pressures, and having their efforts recognised.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesHospital AdministrationState MedicineHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomHealthcare SystemHospitalsManagementOperations Management

Identifiers

PMID39833860
PMCPMC11749087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.