ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Varus/valgus angle of the femoral component relative to the tibial component increases risk of bearing dislocation in medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA), the position of the bearing does not correspond to the planned position which will increasing the risk of bearing dislocation. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the malposition of the femoral and tibial components and the phenomenon of bearing deviation using postoperative radiological measurements.
methodsOne hundred twenty patients who underwent mobile-bearing uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) at our hospital between January and August 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Standard anteroposterior radiographs were obtained postoperatively using C-arm fluoroscopy. A 3D-2D image matching method was used to measure the femoral component varus/valgus angle and internal/external rotation (IR/ER) relative to the tibial component. The bearing position parameters were measured. Patients were divided into varus/valgus and IR/ER groups according to the femoral component varus/valgus and IR/ER angles. The bearing position parameters of each group were compared separately.
resultsThere were 57 patients in the varus group, 63 in the valgus group, 59 in the IR group, and 61 in the ER group. The distance between the bearing lateral edge and the lateral wall of the tibial component (W-BED) was significantly lower in the varus group than the valgus group (1.9 [0-6.4] vs. 2.8 [0.3-7.7] mm; P < 0.001). No differences were detected in any bearing position parameters. The varus/valgus angle of the femoral component showed a significant negative correlation with the W-BED. The IR/ER angle of the femoral component showed no significant correlation with any of the positional parameters.
conclusionsImplantation of femoral component with varus/valgus angle relative to tibial component can cause the bearing to deviate from the planned position. If the varus/valgus angle exceeds 8° it can cause the bearing to hit or away from the lateral wall of the tibial component, resulting in an increased risk of dislocation of the bearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.