ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Efficacy of latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer in anterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff tears and posterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff tears.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical anatomy, biomechanics and clinical outcomes of latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are various options of tendon transfer according to the different types of irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). However, there were no clear treatment options for the IRCTs involving the anterior, superior and posterior rotator cuff tears (global IRCTs). Latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) could be transferred anteriorly or posteriorly in global IRCTs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LDTM transfer in anterosuperior IRCTs (ASIRCTs) and posterosuperior IRCTs (PSIRCTs).
methodsThe patients who underwent anterior LDTM (aLDTM) transfer (aLDTM group, n = 35) for ASIRCTs or pLDTM transfer (aLDTM group, n = 33) for PSIRCTs between January 2017 and December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated based on pain, patient-reported outcome scores, active range of motion (aROM) and strength of aROM. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using arthritic changes in the glenohumeral joint and transferred tendon integrity. Arthritic changes in the glenohumeral joint were evaluated using the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and Hamada classification on the true anteroposterior radiograph.
resultsNo significant intergroup difference was confirmed in patient demographics except for preoperative fat infiltration grade of subscapularis and infraspinatus. The postoperative Constant score, and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) score of aLDTM group were significantly higher than that of pLDTM group (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and UCLA score showed a significant difference between two groups (p = 0.021 and 0.042, respectively). The postoperative forward elevation (FE) was significantly higher in aLDTM group (p = 0.046). The postoperative FE strength and abduction strength were significantly higher in aLDTM group (p = 0.001 and 0.025, respectively). Moreover, the mean improvement of internal rotation strength in aLDTM group was significantly higher than mean improvement of external rotation strength in pLDTM group (p = 0.011). The progression of arthritic change was significantly higher in pLDTM group (p = 0.002).
conclusionAlthough LDTM transfer is an effective and safe treatment option for ASIRCTs and PSIRCTs, LDTM transfer is more effective for ASIRCTs than PSIRCTs due to its biomechanical advantage and tendon transfer principles. LEVEL OF STUDY: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.