ArticleBMC medical education2025
A qualitative exploration of feedback experience among final-year physiotherapy students using activity theory.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFeedback is an important part of learning, however, it often does not have the desired effect. Much work has been done exploring students' engagement with feedback and factors which may impact engagement. Mutual understanding of feedback and feedback practice on the part of the student and educator is essential.
methodsThis study explored the perceptions of feedback of final-year physiotherapy students at Stellenbosch University (South Africa). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted to generate data. Cultural-historical activity theory was used as an analytic lens in the data analysis.
resultsStudents understood feedback to be a continuous, bidirectional conversation in which they were actively involved. Students recognised their agency in feedback practice. Despite their understanding, their agency was often undermined by factors such as the environment, context and most notably the perceived positioning and relationships between students and educators. Educators who were perceived as credible and created a safe psychosocial space had a positive influence on the students' perception of feedback.
conclusionsStudents' perceptions of feedback and their engagement was the product of a complex and dynamic interplay of factors. While students recognise their agency, this may be hindered by relationships and the design of feedback in the curriculum. As educators, one must consider how we contribute to this and enable students to activate and use their agency in feedback practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.