ArticleMalaria journal2025
Comparative performance of microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests, and multiplex real-time PCR for detection of malaria parasites among pregnant women in northwest Ethiopia.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and associated factors of microscopy-confirmed malaria among the general population in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Malaria journal · 2026Pooled it
- Head-to-head evaluation of a commercial real-time PCR assay targeting plasmodial species causing human malaria against a composite reference standard.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Article
- Point of care performance of the improved BIOCREDIT Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) rapid diagnostic test: a cross-sectional study at a health center setting in Ethiopia.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Diagnostic gaps in light microscopy for malaria case management and control in Dilla Zuria Health Facility, southern Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of microscopy and first response™ malaria Ag PAN/Pf RDT compared to qPCR and hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at delivery in Busia County, Western Kenya.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Resurgence of malaria in Ethiopia: a national landscape analysis of systemic and operational gaps.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Ultrasensitive ELISA for Accurate Detection ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow malaria parasitaemia is a diagnostic challenge in pregnancy, leading to false negative microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results. However, these submicroscopic or subpatent infections could cause adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, evaluating the diagnostic performance of microscopy, RDT, and multiplex qPCR in pregnancy is vital for informed decisions.
methodsA total of 835 peripheral blood and 372 placental blood samples were collected from 835 pregnant women attending first antenatal care or admitted for delivery at selected health facilities in northwest Ethiopia between November 2021 and July 2022. In multiplex qPCR, all microscopy and/or RDT positive samples were extracted and amplified individually, whereas all samples negative by both RDT and microscopy were extracted after pooling ten samples together and tested for Plasmodium genus. The diagnostic performance of microscopy, RDT, and multiplex qPCR in pregnancy was compared and evaluated against each other.
resultsUsing multiplex qPCR as a reference test, microscopy had a sensitivity of 73.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.9-80.7) and 62.2% (95% CI: 46.5-76.2) to detect Plasmodium parasites in peripheral and placental blood samples, respectively, with a 100% (95% CI: 98.9-100) specificity in both samples. Similarly, the RDT had a sensitivity of 67.6% (95% CI: 59.3-75.1) and a specificity of 96.5% (95% CI: 94.9-97.8) for Plasmodium infection diagnosis in peripheral blood and a sensitivity of 62.2% (95% CI: 46.5-76.2) and a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 96.9-99.7) in placental blood samples. Considering microscopy as a reference test, multiplex qPCR showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 96.6-100) and a specificity of 94.8% (95% CI: 93.0-96.3) to diagnose Plasmodium infections in both peripheral and placental blood samples. Pooled multiplex qPCR detected 34 peripheral and 12 placental blood Plasmodium infections from microscopy and RDT negative samples. The pooled assay obviated about half of the reactions and its testing costs. Microscopy showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.823) with multiplex qPCR for detecting malaria parasites in pregnancy, whereas the RDT showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.684).
conclusionMultiplex qPCR had a better performance for Plasmodium infection diagnosis in pregnancy compared to microscopy and RDT. Pooled multiplex qPCR could be a sensitive and resource-efficient strategy for epidemiological surveillance of Plasmodium infections in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.