ArticleBMC public health2025
Strategies for strengthening cervical cancer screening programmes in Gwanda district, Zimbabwe: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Challenges of scaling up cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia: a qualitative socio-ecological study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Predicting knowledge of cervical cancer screening among reproductive-age women in sub-saharan africa using machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Applicability of the levels of the socio-ecological model in the context of cervical cancer prevention: a scoping review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Young women's healthcare screening behaviours and sexual autonomy in Ghana: a spatial distribution and socioeconomic inequality analysis of a large population-based survey.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Female sex workers and cervical cancer screening in Kilimanjaro region: Uptake and Behavioural Determinants in Health Belief Model Perspectives: A community-based cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies have been conducted on barriers to cervical cancer screening in low resourced settings. Few have however explored the factors that motivate women to make the decision for screening. This study therefore aimed at identifying strategies that could strengthen the utilisation of screening services, with the goal of informing the development of context for enhancing cervical cancer programmes in Gwanda district, Zimbabwe. The socio-ecological model that implies individual, inter-personal, community, and health system factors as influencers of screening behaviours guided the study.
methodsA cross sectional qualitative design using five focus group discussions with 36 screening-eligible women aged 25-50 years, and 25 in-depth interviews of health providers with varied responsibilities in the screening programme were conducted. Data were analysed thematically with the aid of the Web Atlas.ti software.
resultsKey findings suggest that women's willingness to be screened, on-going awareness campaigns and an increasing number of screening sites and nurses trained in screening procedures promote the uptake of screening. Concomitantly, awareness and knowledge about cervical cancer screening, male support, and community involvement in planning and implementation of programmes were seen as facilitators to screening, with accessibility of cervical cancer screening services being recognised as the most important.
conclusionsTo exploit on women's willingness to be screened, delivery of screening services need to be re-engineered through development of strategies for increased and sustained educational programmes and increase of screening facilities. This could effectively address the prevalent barriers and enhance the facilitators for screening uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.