Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833761›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Understanding the experiences of young, urban, Indigenous mothers-to-be in British Columbia, Canada.

Nicole L A Catherine, Jennifer Leason, Namaste Marsden, Brittany Barker, Ange Cullen, Ashley Simpson, Brandi Anne Berry, Erik Mohns, Donna Yung, Yufei Zheng and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicole L A CatherineFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada. nicole_catherine@sfu.ca.
Jennifer LeasonDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Namaste MarsdenGitanyow Nation; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Brittany BarkerFirst Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ange CullenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ashley SimpsonFirst Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Brandi Anne BerryFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Erik MohnsFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Donna YungFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yufei ZhengFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Harriet MacMillanOfford Centre for Child Studies, Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Charlotte WaddellFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous Peoples comprise the youngest and fastest growing demographic in Canada, with many living in urban-suburban areas. Given higher fertility rates, younger overall ages and higher adolescent pregnancy rates, perinatal research is needed-to inform policymaking and programming throughout pregnancy and childhood. Yet such data remain scarce in British Columbia (BC), Canada. This study therefore aimed to describe the experiences of young, urban, Indigenous mothers-to-be who enrolled in a larger BC early prevention trial designed to reach families experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.

methodsThis descriptive study utilized baseline data from a trial that enrolled first-time mothers-to-be who met indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage and who were residing in select urban-suburban areas. These indicators included being young (19 years or younger) or having limited income, low access to education, and being single (aged 20-24 years). We described and compared survey data on girls (n = 109; aged 14-19 years) and young women (n = 91; aged 20-24 years) using Chi-square or Student's t-tests.

resultsOf the 739 trial participants, 200 or 27% identified as Indigenous and met trial eligibility criteria: limited income (92.9%), limited access to education (67.0%), and/or being single (90.9%). Beyond this, participants reported associated adversities including: unstable housing (63.3%), psychological distress (29.3%), severe anxiety or depression (48.5%), experiences of childhood maltreatment (59.4%) and intimate partner violence (39.5%). Compared to girls, young women reported higher income and educational attainment (p < 0.001), more unstable housing (p = 0.02) and more childhood maltreatment (p = 0.014). Many had recently received primary healthcare (75%), but few had received income assistance (34%). Most (80.5%) reported experiencing four or more adversities.

conclusionsWe present data illustrating that a high proportion of pregnant Indigenous girls and young women engaged with public health and consented to long-term research participation-despite experiencing cumulative adversities. The trial socioeconomic screening criteria were successful in reaching this population. Girls and young women reported relatively similar experiences-beyond expected developmental differences in income and education-suggesting that adolescent maternal age may not necessarily infer risk. Our findings underscore the need for Indigenous community-led services that address avoidable adversities starting in early pregnancy.

Indexed as

Indigenous CanadiansMothersUrban PopulationAdolescentBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAdolescentsGirlsIndigenousMothersPregnancySocioeconomic disadvantageWomen

Identifiers

PMID39833761
PMCPMC11744854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.