ArticleBMC cancer2025
Prognostic values of intracellular cell-related genes in esophageal cancer and their regulatory mechanisms.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR-335-3p acts as a tumor suppressor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and predicts favorable prognosis.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Interleukin-8 in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Risk model based on adenylate uridylate (AU)-rich elements genes for assessing esophageal cancer prognosis and immune landscape.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Integrative single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis reveals the landscape of T cell mitotic catastrophe associated genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a grave malignant condition. While radiotherapy, often in conjunction with chemotherapy, serves as a cornerstone in the management of locally advanced or metastatic cases, patient tolerance and treatment resistance frequently hinder its efficacy. Cell-in-cell structures, prevalent in various tumors, have been linked to prognosis. Hence, investigating the prognostic significance and regulatory mechanisms of genes related to these intracellular structures in esophageal cancer is imperative. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Esophageal Cancer (ESCA) dataset served as the training set for the analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ESCA samples were identified, with those related to intercellular structures designated cell-in-cell-related differential expression genes (CIC-related DEGs). Cox regression analysis was employed to identify prognostic genes, categorizing samples into high- and low-risk groups based on median risk scores. Validation was conducted using the GSE53624 risk model. Established methodologies included morphological mapping, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, prognostic gene expression validation, molecular docking, and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) validation. Thirty-eight intersecting genes were identified between the disease and normal groups in ESCA samples. Stepwise multivariate Cox analysis pinpointed three prognostic genes: androgen receptor (AR), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The risk model's applicability was confirmed in the GSE53624 dataset, revealing eight significantly different immune-related gene sets. Prognostic gene expression validation demonstrated significant differences between the disease and normal groups in both datasets. The proteins corresponding to the three prognostic genes interacted with gefitinib and osimertinib. RT-PCR results corroborated the differential expression of prognostic genes in esophageal cancer tissues. This study identified AR, CXCL8, and EGFR as prognostic genes and demonstrated their molecular interactions with gefitinib and osimertinib, providing a foundation for ESCA diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.