ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Comparison of different decellularization methods for human anterior lens capsules.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced decellularization of human amniotic membrane: optimizing dna clearance and protein retention for clinical applications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman anterior lens capsules (ALCs) have great potential in the treatment of multiple eye diseases, including corneal ulcers, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration and macular holes. ALCs are also regarded as promising scaffolds for various ocular cells. Here, we investigated different decellularization methods for removing lens epithelial cells (LECs) that adhered to ALCs.
methodsHuman ALCs were treated with various solutions, including 2% lidocaine, 10% sodium chloride, 50% glucose and sterile water. Trypan blue and alizarin red (TB-AR) staining, H&E staining and hydroxyproline assays were used to assess the degree of decellularization. The impacts of acellular ALCs on cell viability and cell-tissue interaction were investigated in vitro.
resultsThese findings revealed that 2% lidocaine, 10% sodium chloride, 50% glucose, and sterile water had the capacity to decellularize ALCs at 37 °C. The structure of ALCs in all decellularization groups was similar to that of intact ALCs. The effects of 10% sodium chloride and sterile water on decellularization were significantly better than those of 2% lidocaine and 50% glucose. The H&E staining revealed that the different decellularization methods maintained the integrity of the lens capsular structure. Compared with sterile water, 10% sodium chloride preserved a better level of hydroxyproline. The ALCs in the 10% sodium chloride-treated group and the sterile water-treated group were shown to be suitable for cell adhesion in vitro.
conclusionThis study identified two optimal decellularization methods for acellular ALCs: using 10% sodium chloride and using sterile water. The obtained acellular ALCs could be promising scaffolds for ocular cells. In addition, acellular ALCs do not need resterilization and may be directly used for autologous lens capsule transplantation in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.