ReviewBMC genomics2025
A practical guide for choosing an optimal spatial transcriptomics technology from seven major commercially available options.
Review in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanopriming by vascular stiffness and phenotypic reprogramming by disturbed flow: mechanobiology and clinical translation in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging Organ-on-a-Chip and Omics: A Multi-Dimensional Frontier in Biomedical Research.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Review
- Molecular Mapping of Atherosclerotic Plaques with MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- STAT3D as a new image-tailored Xenium-based spatial transcriptomics tool for accurately dissecting the tumor microenvironment.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Decoding Skeletal Biology Through Transcriptomics: Insights from Bulk, Single-Cell, Spatial, and Multi-Omics Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- RNA-aware tissue preservation workflows for high-quality spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ten quick tips for spatial transcriptomics analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Review
- Amplification bias in sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics: sources, mechanisms, impacts, and mitigation strategies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Next-generation kidney tissue analysis - spatial omics and digital pathology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Volumetric DNA microscopy for mapping spatial transcriptomes in three dimensions.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Emerging Regenerative Medicine for Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Cord Organoids-on-a-Chip.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- D3aist: data-driven detection of atypical interactions in spatial transcriptomics.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Spatial Transcriptomics for Dissecting Cellular and Molecular Heterogeneity in the Aging and Diseased Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Imaging-anchored multiomics in cardiovascular disease: integrating cardiac imaging, bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The applications of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in neuroscience and brain disorders.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Clonal Metamorphosis: Deconstructing MPN Evolution with Single-Cell and Spatial Multi-Omics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Spatial Immunology in Translation: Linking Immune Organisation to Therapeutic Outcome.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimal gene panel selection for targeted spatial transcriptomics experiments.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics technology enables the mapping of gene expression within tissues, allowing researchers to visualize the spatial distribution of RNA molecules and gain insights into cellular organization, interactions, and functions in their native environments. A variety of spatial technologies are now commercially available, each offering distinct technical parameters such as cellular resolution, detection sensitivity, gene coverage, and throughput. This wide range of options can make it challenges or create confusion for researchers to select the most appropriate platform for their specific research objectives. In this paper, we will analyze and compare seven major commercially available spatial platforms to guide researchers in choosing the most suitable option for their needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.