ArticleClinical proteomics2025
ARTN and CCL23 predicted chemosensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia: an Olink
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next-generation leukemia diagnostics: Integrating LC-MS/MS proteomics with liquid biopsy platforms.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard "7 + 3" induction results in 30% of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients not achieving complete remission (CR). We aimed to utilize the Olink
methodsThis prospective study included 43 untreated AML patients, stratified into CR (n = 29) and non-CR (n = 14) groups based on their response to "7 + 3" induction therapy. We employed the Olink
resultsProteomic analysis demonstrated that the CR group exhibited significantly higher bone marrow plasma levels of ARTN and CCL23 than did the non-CR group. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a higher proportion of tissue samples with intense staining for ARTN (25.40% vs. 7.05%, p = 0.013) and CCL23 (24.14% vs. 14.29%, p = 0.039) in the CR group. These findings were corroborated by bulk-RNA-seq, which indicated significantly elevated mRNA expression levels of ARTN (1.93 vs. -0.09; p = 0.003) and CCL23 (1.50 vs. 0.12; p = 0.021) in the CR group. The Human Protein Atlas provided external support for our findings.
conclusionsThe results suggest that ARTN and CCL23 may serve as biomarkers for predicting responsiveness to the "7 + 3" induction in untreated AML. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to identify the roles of ARTN and CCL23 in predicting AML chemosensitivity may enhance clinical applicability in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.