Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833679›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2025

Anesthesia for pregnant patients with symptomatic neurological disease: 13 years' experience from a tertiary care center.

Stefano Catarci, Bruno Antonio Zanfini, Marco Scorzoni, Salvatore De Martino, Pietro Paolo Giuri, Luciano Frassanito, Gian Luigi Gonnella, Emanuele Capone, Francesco Vitale Di Maio, Giovanni Maddaloni and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comprehensive Review of Anesthetic Strategies for Patients With Neurodegenerative Diseases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefano CatarciDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy. stefano.catarci@policlinicogemelli.it.
Bruno Antonio ZanfiniDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Marco ScorzoniDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore De MartinoDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Pietro Paolo GiuriDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Luciano FrassanitoDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Gian Luigi GonnellaDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele CaponeDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Vitale Di MaioDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni MaddaloniDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Antonio LanzoneDepartment of Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Gaetano DraisciDepartment of Scienze Dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovements in diagnostics and clinical care have allowed more women of childbearing age, suffering from neurological diseases, to safely have pregnancy, reducing peripartum complications. However, these patients remain at risk and are a constant challenge for anesthesiologists in the delivery room.

methodsTo assess the type of anesthesiologic management performed for delivery in obstetric patients with preexisting neurological disease and who reported significant neurological symptoms during pregnancy, a retrospective observational study was carried out between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2021.

resultsData from 49,202 pregnant women were assessed over 13 years; 239 pregnant women with a diagnosis of preexisting neurological disease and who reported significant neurological symptoms during pregnancy were identified (prevalence 0.49%). The main neurological disorders that affected pregnant women included vascular abnormalities and intracranial bleeding (N = 42, 17.6%), central nervous system tumors (N = 35, 14.6%), epilepsy and episodic and paroxysmal disorders of the central nervous system (N = 34, 14.2%), diseases of the neuromuscular junction and muscles (N = 26, 10.9%), demyelinating central nervous system diseases (N = 24, 10%). A total of 234 (97.9%) pregnant women with neurological disorders and significant neurological symptoms underwent cesarean section: 192 (80.3% of the total cesarean sections) were elective, 39 (16.3%) were urgent type 2 and 3; 3 (1.2%) were emergency cesarean sections. General anesthesia was administered to 73 patients (30.5%), while 166 patients (69.5%) were managed with neuraxial techniques. 2 patients who had had neuraxial block reported worsening neurological symptoms that required a change in medical therapy. Postoperative multiparameter monitoring was performed for less than 24 h in the recovery room for 226 patients (94.6%). 3 patients (1.2%) were observed with multiparameter monitoring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for more than 24 hours; 10 patients (4.2%) were moved to the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). The median hospitalization duration was 4 days (with an interquartile difference of 3-6 days).

conclusionsIn our experience, when neuraxial anesthesia was feasible, it proved to be a safe option for pregnant patients with symptomatic neurological disease, resulting in uncommon maternal complications.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalNervous System DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersCesarean sectionNeurological diseaseNeuromuscular diseaseObstetric anesthesiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39833679
PMCPMC11744999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.