ArticleDrug safety2025
Clinical Relatedness and Stability of vigiVec Semantic Vector Representations of Adverse Events and Drugs in Pharmacovigilance.
Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analysis of interstitial lung disease in pharmacovigilance databases: Coding challenges and interpretation biases-An update.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Contrastive learning of adverse events to provide effective and interpretable vector representations for machine-assisted pharmacovigilance.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- VigiBase: Resource Profile Update with a Summary of Global Patterns and Trends in Adverse Event Reports for Medicines and Vaccines.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Charting and Sidestepping the Pitfalls of Disproportionality Analysis.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Ontology-based Semantic Similarity Measures for Clustering Medical Concepts in Drug Safety.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividual case reports are essential to identify and assess previously unknown adverse effects of medicines. On these reports, information on adverse events (AEs) and drugs are encoded in hierarchical terminologies. Encoding differences may hinder the retrieval and analysis of clinically related reports relevant to a topic of interest. Recent studies have explored the use of data-driven semantic vector representations to support analysis of pharmacovigilance data.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the stability and clinical relatedness of vigiVec, a semantic vector representation for codes of AEs and drugs.
methodsvigiVec is a published adaptation to pharmacovigilance of the publicly available Word2Vec model, applied to structured data instead of free text. It provides vector representations for MedDRA
resultsAmong the ten nearest neighbors, 1.8 AEs on average belonged to the same MedDRA High Level Term (HLT; e.g., coagulopathies), and 1.3 drugs belonged to the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical level 3 (ATC-3; e.g., opioids). In the intruder detection task, when neighbors and intruders were both chosen from the same HLT, the intruder detection rate was 46%. When selected from different HLTs, it was 79%. By random chance, we should expect 20% (1 in 5). Corresponding rates for drugs were 42% in same ATC-3 and 65% in different ATC-3. The stability of nearest neighbors was 80% for AEs and 64% for drugs.
conclusionNearest neighbors identified with vigiVec are stable and show high level of clinical relatedness. They are often from different parts of the existing hierarchies and complement these.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.