ArticleOral radiology2025
Radiomorphometric indices for measuring mandibular bone quality in oncologic patients.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis Diagnostics in Dental Radiology (Panoramic Radiograph): The Mini Osteoporosis Pre-Screening (MOPS).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective study compared the thickness and degree of resorption of the mandibular cortex in patients with head and neck cancer (AG), patients with cancer at sites other than the head and neck (BG), and patients with no cancer (CG) to describe and compare the changes in the mandible after antineoplastic therapy and their possible clinical implications. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 287 panoramic radiographs were examined. The following radiomorphometric indices were analyzed: mental index (MI), panoramic mandibular index (PMI), and mandibular cortical index (MCI). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal‒Wallis test, with p < 0.05 considered significant, were performed.
resultsMales predominated in the AG (83%), while females predominated in the BG and CG (78.6 and 62%, respectively). In the AG, tongue carcinoma (22.1%) was prevalent, while in the BG, breast carcinoma was predominant (53.8%). All parameters measured in the AG and BG patients were significantly lower than those in the CG patients: MI (p < 0.001), right PMIc/a (p < 0.001), left PMIc/a (p < 0.001), right PMIc/b (p = 0.004), left PMIc/b (p < 0.001), and MCI (p < 0.001).
conclusionsRadiomorphometric indices MI, PMI, and MCI were significantly lower in panoramic radiographs of patients with head and neck cancer and patients with cancer in other regions of the body than in those of nononcological patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39833640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.