Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833591›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

Effect of spatial training on space-number mapping: a situated cognition account.

Julie Lenoir, Arnaud Badets

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julie LenoirUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, INCIA - Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, Bâtiment Bordeaux Biologie Santé (BBS), 2, rue du Dr Hoffmann Martinot, 33000, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4141-1453
Arnaud BadetsUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, INCIA - Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, Bâtiment Bordeaux Biologie Santé (BBS), 2, rue du Dr Hoffmann Martinot, 33000, Bordeaux, France. arnaud.badets@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-1048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From an embodied perspective of cognition, number processing influences the spatial organization of motor responses showing faster left/right responses to small/large numbers. Recent evidence suggests that such spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) along the transverse and sagittal planes are mutually exclusive with respect to the spatial reference frames used by the participant. Specifically, in egocentric and allocentric frames, SNAs appear along the sagittal and transverse plane, respectively. The first aim of this study was to replicate previous findings. The second aim was to explore the role of switching spatial reference frames in SNAs occurrence according to the processed plane. Consequently, during a referential frame switching (RFS) training, participants were required to identify targets based on an embodied avatar's perspective. Using a random number generation (RNG) task after observing an avatar's displacement, we investigated the effect of RFS training on SNAs organization across the different planes (Experiment 1 & 2 for the egocentric and allocentric perspectives, respectively). Both experiments replicated previous results, but more importantly, RFS training enables the development of new situated cognition strategies from egocentric perspectives and the generalization of transverse SNAs to other planes from allocentric perspectives.

Indexed as

CognitionMathematical ConceptsPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.