ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Development and Implementation of Automated Referral Triaging System for Spinal Cord Stimulation Procedure in Pain Medicine.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multistage machine learning model for automated referral triage in pain medicine.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective referral triaging enhances patient service outcomes, experience and access to care especially for specialized procedures. This study presents the development and implementation of an automated triaging system to predict patients who would benefit from Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) procedure for their pain management. The proposed triage system aims to improve the triage process by reducing unnecessary appointments before SCS assessment, ensuring appropriate pain management care. It compares various machine learning techniques for the prediction while addressing the class imbalance and overlap challenges inherent in the data. Both data-level and algorithm-level approaches were explored. Two years of patient data was collected including patient characteristics, diagnosis history, pain symptoms, appointment history, medication history, and concepts from clinical notes extracted using Natural Language Processing. EasyEnsemble with Ada Boosting method, an algorithm-level approach, showed the most promising results. The tenfold validation indicated the average area under curve of 0.82, true positive rate (TPR) of 77.3%, and true negative rate (TNR) of 73.0%. The probability threshold was adjusted to 0.575 to meet practice expectation of 15% or less on false positive rate (FPR). The implementation pipeline for the selected model was designed to be applicable to real clinical settings. The one-year implementation results showed TPR of 64.7% and TNR of 87.2%, which reduced FPR by 12.8% while reduced TPR by 12.6%. The trade-off was acceptable to practice. The proposed triage system demonstrated promising accuracy, leading to the enhancement of scheduling systems, patient care, and the reduction of unnecessary appointments in a pain medicine setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39833558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.