ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Angulation of the dural venous sinuses in the posterior cranial fossa: an anatomical study and its implications for venous circulation.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering neurovascular thrombosis: Light-based bioprinting for patient-specific modeling and women's cerebrovascular health.Science advances · 2026Review
- Anatomical Variability of the Transverse and Sigmoid Sinus Grooves: Implications for Skull Base Surgery.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Morphological Variability of Dural Venous Sinus Grooves and Internal Bony Findings: Clinical and Surgical Considerations.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Reply to the Comment: "Morphological Variability of Dural Venous Sinus Grooves and Internal Bony Findings: Clinical and Surgical Considerations".Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Morphological variability of the jugular foramen: a comprehensive anatomical-imaging study emphasizing its compartmentalization.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to determine the angulation of the dural venous sinuses in soft tissue, to evaluate differences between types of tissue, and to discuss the potential influence of these angulations on intracranial venous hemodynamics and related pathologies. Angulations formed in different segments of the transverse, sigmoid, and superior sagittal sinuses were measured in 13 adult human cadaveric heads (26 sides). After the soft tissues were removed, measurements were also taken from the underlying bone. The overall angulation of the transverse sinus was assessed using two reference points, while the lengths and widths of the dural venous sinuses were measured using microcalipers. Statistical analyses were performed considereing sides, sex, and types of tissue. The mean angulation of the superior sagittal sinuses - transverse sinus junction was 116 degrees. The mean angulations of the transverse sinus - sigmoid sinus junction in medial and superior views were 108 degrees and 114 degrees, respectively. The mean angulations of the entire transverse sinus at two different points were 45 degrees and 44 degrees, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in angulation in some variables when they were adjusted for sides and sex, but not types of tissue. Angulation is a paramount factor in venous hemodynamics. Certain angulations of the dural venous sinuses differed significantly between sides and sexes, but not between types of tissue. Future research should investigate the effects of these angulations on intracranial venous circulation and their relevance to related pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.