ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys in Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex, Drugs, and the Language of Donor Narratives: Associations With Kidney Acceptance.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- A Kidney Transplant Support System for Patient-Clinician Shared Decision-Making.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the low deceased donation rates despite increasing rates of end-stage kidney disease in Asia, minimizing donor kidney discard is important. This study aimed to investigate the current situation of donor kidney discard in Korea. This nationwide study included deceased donor kidneys of candidates for kidney transplantation (KT) between 2013 and 2018 in Korea. Kidney discard was defined as no procurement or discarding after procurement of kidneys. Among 5592 deceased donor kidneys, no-procurement, single-procurement, and double-procurement were 385, 63, and 5144, respectively. All unilaterally procured kidneys, except for one, were transplanted. Bilaterally procured kidneys were accompanied by two KT (n = 5058), one KT with the other kidney discarded (n = 33), or both kidneys discarded (n = 20). The overall kidney discard rate was 7.9%. The cause of non-procurement was universally organ damage, and the common causes of kidney discard after procurement were organ damage, absence of available candidates, and malignancy. While the kidney donor profile index was higher in the discarded group than in the KT group, a large overlap was observed. The risk factors for kidney non-utilization were old age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high serum creatinine levels, low hemoglobin levels, and non-cerebrovascular causes of death. KT using contralateral kidney in the discard group showed graft failure and mortality rates comparable to those of KT in the no-discard group. The discard rate of deceased donor kidneys was low, and the discard of one kidney does not necessarily rule out the utilization of contralateral kidney, especially in Korea with a long waiting time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.