ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2025
CTNNB1 syndrome mouse models.
Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CTNNB1 syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder, affecting children worldwide with a prevalence of 2.6-3.2 per 100,000 births and often misdiagnosed as cerebral palsy. De novo loss-of-function mutations in the Ctnnb1 gene result in dysfunction of the β-catenin protein, disrupting the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, which plays a key role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis. Additionally, these mutations impair the formation of cell junctions, adversely affecting tissue architecture. Motor and speech deficits, cognitive impairment, cardiovascular and visual problems are just some of the key symptoms that occur in CTNNB1 syndrome patients. There is currently no effective treatment option available for patients with CTNNB1 syndrome, with support largely focused on the management of symptoms and physiotherapy, yet recently some therapeutic approaches are being developed. Animal testing is still crucial in the process of new drug development, and mouse models are particularly important. These models provide researchers with new understanding of the disease mechanisms and are invaluable for testing the efficacy and safety of potential treatments. The development of various mouse models with β-catenin loss- and gain-of-function mutations successfully replicates key features of intellectual disability, autism-like behaviors, motor deficits, and more. These models provide a valuable platform for studying disease mechanisms and offer a powerful tool for testing the therapeutic potential and effectiveness of new drug candidates, paving the way for future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.