Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833460›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Disgust memory enhancement extends to more accurate memory but not more false memories.

Lucy A Matson, Ella K Moeck, Tyla R Molyneux, Melanie K T Takarangi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucy A MatsonCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Ella K MoeckSchool of Psychology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tyla R MolyneuxCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Melanie K T TakarangiCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia. melanie.takarangi@flinders.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People show enhanced memory recall for disgust over fear, despite both being highly negative and arousing emotions. But does disgust's 'stickiness' in memory result in more false memories for disgust versus fear? Existing research finds low false-memory rates for disgust and fear, perhaps from using image lures depicting content unrelated to target images. Therefore, we presented 111 participants with disgust, fear, (and neutral) images during an attention-monitoring task. After 24-48 hours, participants completed a recognition test, where they viewed 'old' (previously seen) and 'new' images (both related and unrelated lures) and indicated whether each image was 'old' or 'new'. Relative to fear, participants experienced fewer false memories of disgust for unrelated lures, but similar false memories for related lures. Furthermore, participants' attention was captured more by disgust than fear images, and correct recognition and memory sensitivity were enhanced for disgust relative to fear. Our findings suggest disgust memory enhancement extends to accurate memory, which has clinical implications.

Indexed as

AttentionDisgustFearMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyRepression, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDisgustFalse memoryFearPosttraumatic stressRecognition

Identifiers

PMID39833460
PMCPMC12402033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.