Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833453›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Recent clinical studies and the S3 guidelines on stroke].

Wolfgang Reith, Armin Bachhuber

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolfgang ReithKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland. Wolfgang.Reith@uks.eu.
Armin BachhuberKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of patients with acute stroke requires hospitalization. Cooperation of neurologists, neuroradiologists, intensive care physicians, internists, and cardiologists is required to achieve best possible outcome.

objectiveA summary of the current recommendations for stroke treatment is provided.

methodsThis update is based on the S3 guidelines and incorporates additional results of the latest clinical studies; pubmed.gov was used as the database.

resultsComputed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential to differentiate between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The S3 guideline recommends thrombolysis within 4.5 h after the onset of symptoms, while mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions may be indicated up to 24 h after stroke onset in certain cases. Therapy should be initiated for an internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of at least 50%.

conclusionThrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and the treatment of ICA stenosis are the three cornerstones of acute stroke treatment.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicStrokeCarotid StenosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyTomography, X-Ray ComputedInternal carotid artery stenosisIschemic strokeSecondary preventionThrombectomyThrombolysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.