Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833434›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Patient education on Instagram? Structured content analysis of the hashtag "obstructivesleepapnea".

Christopher Seifen, Johannes Pordzik, Katharina Ludwig, Katharina Bahr-Hamm, Christoph Raphael Buhr, Christoph Matthias, Haralampos Gouveris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher SeifenSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. kim.seifen@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-7494
Johannes PordzikSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina LudwigSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina Bahr-HammSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph Raphael BuhrSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph MatthiasSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Haralampos GouverisSleep Medicine Center & Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInstagram ranks among the most used social media platforms worldwide. An increasing number of posts are dedicated to specific medical topics, such as sleep medicine. The educational content of these posts is largely unknown. Therefore, a structured content analysis of posts linked to the hashtag "obstructivesleepapnea" was conducted, as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) represents the most common sleep-related breathing disorder.

methodsThe hashtag "obstructivesleepapnea" was entered into Instagram's search field. The first linked post was selected and then subdivided into visual content and text content for systematic analysis with a focus on educational information on OSA. Demographic factors of the post such as likes, hashtags and the posting account were also included in the analysis. The data collection was completed for N = 150 consecutive posts.

results37.3% of the visual content and 32.7% of the text content addressed educational information on OSA. In both subgroups, the most frequently discussed aspects were OSA symptoms, comorbidities, and therapy (visual content: 50.0%, 39.3, and 41.1%, respectively; text content: 42.9%, 44.9%, and 24.9%, respectively). The most common (professional) background of the account, as self-stated by the holder, was dentists (29.5%). Additional sleep medicine content was posted by 34.3% of all accounts.

conclusionInstagram offers informative content about OSA and is therefore a potential source for patient education. However, the content available is often poorly organized and in most cases incomplete. Patients may have difficulty categorizing the information provided to benefit from it.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSocial MediaHumansContent analysisInstagramObstructive sleep apneaPatient educationSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39833434
PMCPMC12987904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.