Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of biopsy free nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.

Junxin Wang, Mingzhe Chen, Shanqi Guo, Yong Xu, Liwei Liu, Xingkang Jiang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Beyond Total PSA: Clinical Significance of S2,3PSA% in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junxin Wang *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi Destrict, Tianjin, 300211, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6654-9541
Mingzhe Chen *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi Destrict, Tianjin, 300211, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5239-9933
Shanqi Guo *Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300381, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-4567
Yong XuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi Destrict, Tianjin, 300211, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8060-3498
Liwei LiuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi Destrict, Tianjin, 300211, China. liuliwei3408@163.com.
Xingkang JiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi Destrict, Tianjin, 300211, China. jiangx@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-1655

Funding

Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University MNRC202312Tianjin Health Science and Technology KJ20169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and validate biopsy-free nomograms to more accurately predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥ 4 lesions. A cohort of 931 patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions, undergoing prostate biopsies or radical prostatectomy from January 2020 to August 2023, was analyzed. Various clinical variables, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), prostate health index (PHI), and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) from PSMA PET-CT imaging, were assessed for predicting csPCa. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision-curve analyses, with internal validation. The foundational model (nomogram 1) encompassed the entire cohort, accurately predicting csPCa by incorporating variables such as age, PSAD, PV, PSA ratio variations, suspicious lesion location, and history of acute urinary retention (AUR). The AUC for csPCa prediction achieved by the foundational model was 0.918, with internal validation confirming reliability (AUC: 0.908). Advanced models (nomogram 2 and 3), incorporating PHI and PHI + PSMA SUVmax, achieved AUCs of 0.908 and 0.955 in the training set and 0.847 and 0.949 in the validation set, respectively. Decision analysis indicated enhanced biopsy outcome predictions with the advanced models. Nomogram 3 could potentially reduce biopsies by 92.41%, while missing only 1.53% of csPCa cases. In conclusion, the newly biopsy-free approaches for patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions represent a significant advancement in csPCa diagnosis in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

NomogramsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigen(18)F-PSMA-11Magnetic resonance imagingNomogramsPositron emission tomography computed tomographyProstate neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39833430
PMCPMC11747484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.