Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trip route optimization based on bus transit using genetic algorithm with different crossover techniques: a case study in Konya/Türkiye.

Akylai Bolotbekova, Huseyin Hakli, Ayse Beskirli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akylai BolotbekovaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42090, Türkiye.
Huseyin HakliDepartment of Computer Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42090, Türkiye. hhakli@erbakan.edu.tr.
Ayse BeskirliFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, 70200, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the importance of time and cost in today's world, it is essential to solve problems in the best way possible. Optimization is a process used to achieve this goal and is applied in several areas, one of which is route planning. Route optimization minimizes the use of resources such as fuel, distance, and time. This study aims to optimize the traveler's route, allowing the traveler to save money on fuel and visit more tourist attractions by utilizing the time saved. For this purpose, an application is developed that presents the attractions in a chosen province and then finds the acceptable route between the selected attractions. According to the obtained visit order, the bus or buses that will provide the fastest transportation between both locations are presented. The route is determined with a genetic algorithm (GA), which is known as one of the most effective optimization algorithms. In order to select the most appropriate crossover operator of the genetic algorithm, the performances of seven methods, namely One Point Crossover (OX1), Two Point Crossover (OX2), Position Based Crossover (PBX), Order Based Crossover (OBX), Partially Mapped Crossover (PMX), Cycle Crossover (CX) and Inversion Crossover (IX) are tested on the real-world problem in Konya/Türkiye. In addition, parameter tuning is performed for the values of the algorithm's parameters such as population size, number of iterations, crossover rate, and mutation rate. As a result of the comparison, PBX is defined as the most suitable method for the problem. In addition, combinations of the four crossover methods (PMX, PBX, OX1, OX2) that obtained the best results according to the experimental analyses were compared. The comparison show that combinations of the PBX method are found to be the most suitable and the use of crossover techniques as ensemble is more effective than crossover techniques used separately. Furthermore, the best combination method named PBX + OX1 of GA was compared with ABC, ACO, SA, TSA, and PSO methods. This method is determined to find the maximum number of feasible solutions for a 14-stop real-world problem and it's the shortest route in all trials and handling them in fewer iterations.

Indexed as

Crossover operatorsGenetic algorithmRoute optimizationTraveling salesman problemTrip route planning

Identifiers

PMID39833418
PMCPMC11747179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.