ArticleScientific reports2025
Convolutional neural networks for accurate real-time diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma using high-resolution in vivo confocal microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quercetin as a Therapeutic Agent for Oral Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Image-Based Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Malignant Transformation of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted Screening Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: A Global Review of Evidence, Technologies, and Cost-Effectiveness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Role of optical imaging in oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: implications for oral submucous fibrosis.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cancer detection is based on biopsy histopathology, however with digital microscopy imaging technology there is real potential for rapid multi-site imaging and simultaneous diagnostic analysis. Fifty-nine patients with oral mucosal abnormalities were imaged in vivo with a confocal laser endomicroscope using the contrast agents acriflavine and fluorescein for the detection of oral epithelial dysplasia and oral cancer. To analyse the 9168 images frames obtained, three tandem applied pre-trained Inception-V3 convolutional neural network (CNN) models were developed using transfer learning in the PyTorch framework. The first CNN was used to filter for image quality, followed by image specific diagnostic triage models for fluorescein and acriflavine, respectively. Images were categorised based on a histopathological diagnosis into 4 categories: no dysplasia, lichenoid lesions, low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia/oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The quality filtering model had an accuracy of 89.5%. The acriflavine diagnostic model performed well for identifying lichenoid (AUC = 0.94) and low-grade dysplasia (AUC = 0.91) but poorly for identifying no dysplasia (AUC = 0.44) or high-grade dysplasia/OSCC (AUC = 0.28). In contrast, the fluorescein diagnostic model had high classification performance for all diagnostic classes (AUC range = 0.90-0.96). These models had a rapid classification speed of less than 1/10th of a second per image. Our study suggests that tandem CNNs can provide highly accurate and rapid real-time diagnostic triage for in vivo assessment of high-risk oral mucosal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.