Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning classification and biochemical characteristics in the real-time diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma using Raman spectroscopy.

Alex Noh, Sabrina Xin Zi Quek, Nuraini Zailani, Juin Shin Wee, Derrick Yong, Byeong Yun Ahn, Khek Yu Ho, Hyunsoo Chung

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tumor Exposomics: A New Paradigm for Individualized Continuous Exposure Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Diagnosis.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex NohSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-7471
Sabrina Xin Zi QuekDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-1528
Nuraini ZailaniSingapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.
Juin Shin WeeNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Derrick YongNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Byeong Yun AhnArmed Forces Seoul Center District Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Khek Yu HoNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. mdchoky@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-2932-1962
Hyunsoo ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. h.chung@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-5159-357X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify biomolecular differences between benign gastric tissues (gastritis/intestinal metaplasia) and gastric adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the diagnostic power of Raman spectroscopy-based machine learning in gastric adenocarcinoma. Raman spectroscopy-based machine learning was applied in real-time during endoscopy in 19 patients (aged 51-85 years) with high-risk for gastric adenocarcinoma. Raman spectra were captured from suspicious lesions and adjacent normal mucosa, which were biopsied for matched histopathologic diagnosis. Spectral data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to develop a machine learning model for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma. High-quality spectra (800-3300 cm⁻¹) revealed distinct patterns: adenocarcinoma tissues had higher intensities below 3150 cm⁻¹, while benign tissues exhibited higher intensities between 3150 and 3290 cm⁻¹ (p < 0.001). The model achieved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of 0.905, 0.942, 0.787, and 0.957, respectively. Biochemical correlations suggested adenocarcinoma tissues had increased protein (e.g., phenylalanine), reduced lipids, and lower water content compared to benign tissues. This study highlights the potential of Raman spectroscopy with machine learning as a real-time diagnostic tool for gastric adenocarcinoma. Further validation could establish this technique as a non-invasive, accurate method to aid clinical decision-making during endoscopy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaMachine LearningSpectrum Analysis, RamanStomach NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisGastric cancerMachine learningMass spectrometry imagingRaman spectroscopyReal-time diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39833353
PMCPMC11747496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.