ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized digital workflow for pathologist-grade evaluation in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and ultimately fatal disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by interstitial fibrosis of the lungs. Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model (BLM model) is a widely used animal model to evaluate therapeutic targets for IPF. Histopathological analysis of lung fibrosis is an important method for evaluating BLM model. However, this method requires expertise in recognizing complex visual patterns and is time-consuming, making the workflow difficult and inefficient. Therefore, we developed a new workflow for BLM model that reduces inter- and intra-observer variations and improves the evaluation process. We generated deep learning models for grading lung fibrosis that were able to achieve accuracy comparable to that of pathologists. These models incorporate complex image patterns and qualitative factors, such as collagen texture and distribution, potentially identifying drug candidates overlooked in evaluations based solely on simple area extraction. This deep learning-based fibrosis grade assessment has the potential to streamline drug development for pulmonary fibrosis by offering higher granularity and reproducibility in evaluating BLM model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.