Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833338›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Fabienne Kreimer, Marie Lewenhardt, Ibrahim El-Battrawy, Arash Haghikia, Michael Gotzmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabienne KreimerDepartment of Cardiology II - Rhythmology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Marie LewenhardtDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Ibrahim El-BattrawyDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Arash HaghikiaDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Michael GotzmannDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. michael.gotzmann@rub.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trends in patient selection and outcomes over a decade-long inclusion period. This study analysed 422 patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2011 and 2020. The study endpoint "no-benefit" was characterized by death from any cause occurring without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Benefit of ICD implantation was defined as either receiving appropriate ICD therapy before death or surviving until the end of the observation period. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.0 years, no-benefit of ICD implantation was observed in 84 patients (20%). Independent risk factors for no-benefit were age ≥ 68 years (HR 4.599, p < 0.001), anemia (HR 2.549, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.066, p = 0.007), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.939, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis by age < 68 years and ≥ 68 years demonstrated that the risk of no-benefit increases with age and comorbidities. When comparing patients with ICD implantation in 2011-2015 with those in 2016-2020, there were no significant differences in one-, two- and three-year-no-benefit rates. Different comorbidities were associated with no-benefit in the early and late implantation groups. Risk factors such as older age and specific comorbidities are associated with a higher likelihood of no-benefit from ICD implantation. A careful patient selection and consideration of individual risk factors besides advanced age is important.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableRisk FactorsAgedAge FactorsDeath, Sudden, CardiacFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrevalenceProsthesis ImplantationTime FactorsAgeBenefitComorbiditiesImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorNon-benefitRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39833338
PMCPMC11756404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.