Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833322›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2025

Differential effects of β-hydroxybutyrate and α-ketoglutarate on HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell viability under normoxic and hypoxic low-glucose conditions: exploring the role of SRC, HIF1α, ACAT1, and SIRT2 genes.

Parisa Badameh, Farideh Akhlaghi Tabar, Nima Mohammadipoor, Roya Rezaei, Roza Ranjkesh, Mohammad Hasan Maleki, Omid Vakili, Sayed Mohammad Shafiee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Parisa Badameh *Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Farideh Akhlaghi Tabar *Department of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
Nima MohammadipoorDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Roya RezaeiDepartment of Microbiology, College of Science, Agriculture and Modern Technology, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
Roza RanjkeshDepartment of Biology, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
Mohammad Hasan MalekiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Omid VakiliDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Sayed Mohammad ShafieeAutophagy Research Center, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. shafieem@sums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-2267

Funding

Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 31075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent therapeutic strategies have highlighted the potential of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) as effective anticancer agents, particularly for colon cancer. These metabolites can modulate cellular metabolism and induce epigenetic changes, inhibiting tumor growth. Nonetheless, certain cancer cells may utilize ketone bodies, like BHB as nutrient sources under hypoxic conditions, potentially reducing treatment efficacy. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for optimizing cancer therapies. This study evaluated the effects of BHB and α-KG on HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell viability under normoxic and low-glucose hypoxic conditions. HCT-116 cell lines were treated with different doses of BHB and α-KG in normoxic and low-glucose hypoxic conditions, and then cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. Moreover, the mRNA expression levels of SRC, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1 (ACAT1), and sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) genes were determined using quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (q RT-PCR). BHB significantly increased the proliferation of HCT-116 colon cancer cells under low-glucose hypoxic conditions, while α-KG maintained cell viability in normoxic conditions but not in hypoxia. BHB treatment reduced SIRT2 mRNA levels and increased ACAT1, SRC, and HIF-1α expression. Conversely, α-KG decreased ACAT1, SRC, and HIF-1α expression and increased SIRT2 levels in normoxia but could not reverse gene expression during hypoxia. Our study demonstrated that BHB and α-KG exhibited complex interactions with colon cancer cell viability under varying oxygen and glucose conditions. While BHB promoted cell proliferation in hypoxic environments, α-KG showed protective effects in normoxic conditions. This research contributed to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of metabolic modulators in cancer therapy and emphasized the importance of understanding tumor microenvironments to optimize treatment outcomes. However, the need for further research into the metabolic pathways is underscored to enhance therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

3-Hydroxybutyric AcidAcetyl-CoA C-AcetyltransferaseColorectal NeoplasmsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitKetoglutaric AcidsSirtuin 2src-Family KinasesCell HypoxiaCell ProliferationCell SurvivalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlucoseHCT116 CellsHumans3-Hydroxybutyric AcidACAT1 protein, humanAcetyl-CoA C-AcetyltransferaseGlucoseHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitKetoglutaric AcidsSIRT2 protein, humanSirtuin 2src-Family KinasesAlpha-ketoglutarateBeta-hydroxybutyrateColorectal cancerHypoxia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.