ArticleScientific reports2025
Visual impairment prevention by early detection of diabetic retinopathy based on stacked auto-encoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIRD-Net: An Explainable CNN-Based Framework with Attention Mechanism for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis Using CLAHE-D-DoG Enhanced Fundus Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A hybrid deep learning framework for early detection of diabetic retinopathy using retinal fundus images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: advancing diagnosis, precision surgery, and anti-VEGF therapy optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Association between dietary niacin intake and diabetic retinopathy in a Catalonian population: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) presents a significant concern among diabetic patients, often leading to vision impairment or blindness if left untreated. Traditional diagnosis methods are prone to human error, necessitating accurate alternatives. While various computer-aided systems have been developed to assist in DR detection, there remains a need for accurate and efficient methods to classify its stages. In this study, we propose a novel approach utilizing enhanced stacked auto-encoders for the detection and classification of DR stages. The classification is performed across one healthy (normal) stage and four DR stages: mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. Unlike traditional CNN approaches, our method offers improved reliability by reducing time complexity, minimizing errors, and enhancing noise reduction. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset from KAGGLE containing 35,126 retinal fundus images representing one healthy (normal) stage and four DR stages, our proposed model demonstrates superior accuracy compared to existing deep learning algorithms. Data augmentation techniques address class imbalance, while SAEs facilitate accurate classification through layer-wise unsupervised pre-training and supervised fine-tuning. We evaluate our model's performance using rigorous quantitative measures, including accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score, highlighting its effectiveness in early disease diagnosis and prevention of blindness. Experimental results across different training/testing ratios (50:50, 60:40, 70:30, and 75:25) showcase the model's robustness. The highest accuracy achieved during training was 93%, while testing accuracy reached 88% on a training/testing ratio of 75:25. Comparative analysis underscores the model's superiority over existing methods, positioning it as a promising tool for early-stage DR detection and blindness prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.