ArticleScientific reports2025
Electro-tactile modulation of muscle activation and intermuscular coordination in the human upper extremity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic current ratio control and biophysical modeling for personalised electro-tactile perception.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electro-tactile stimulation (ETS) can be a promising aid in augmenting sensation for those with sensory deficits. Although applications of ETS have been explored, the impact of ETS on the underlying strategies of neuromuscular coordination remains largely unexplored. We investigated how ETS, alone or in the presence of mechano-tactile environment change, modulated the electromyogram (EMG) of individual muscles during force control and how the stimulation modulated the attributes of intermuscular coordination, assessed by muscle synergy analysis, in human upper extremities. ETS was applied to either the thumb or middle fingertip which had greater contact with the handle, grasped by the participant, and supported a target force match. EMGs were recorded from 11 arm muscles of 15 healthy participants during three-dimensional exploratory force control. EMGs were modeled as the linear combination of muscle co-activation patterns (the composition of muscle synergies) and their activation profiles. Individual arm muscle activation changed depending on the ETS location on the finger. The composition of muscle synergies was conserved, but synergy activation coefficients altered reflecting the effects of electro-tactile modulation. The mechano-tactile modulation tended to decrease the effects of ETS on the individual muscle activation and synergy activation magnitude. This study provides insights into sensory augmentation and its impact on intermuscular coordination in the human upper extremity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.