ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating canonical size phenomenon in drawing from memory task in different perceptual conditions among children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The canonical size phenomenon refers to the mental representation of real-object size information: the objects larger in the physical world are represented as larger in mental spatial representations. This study tested this phenomenon in a drawing-from-memory task among children aged 5, 7, and 9 years. The participants were asked to draw objects whose actual sizes varied at eight size rank levels. Drawings were made on regular paper sheets or special foils to produce embossed drawings. When drawing from memory, the participants were either sighted or blindfolded (to prevent visual feedback). We predicted that the drawn size of objects would increase with increasing size rank of objects. The findings supported the hypothesis concerning the canonical size effect among all age groups tested. This means that children aged 5 to 9 represent real-world size information about everyday objects and are sensitive to their size subtleties. Moreover, the drawn size increased with increasing size ranks both within sighted and blindfolded perceptual conditions (however, the slope of functions that best explain the relation between size rank and drawn size varied between the perceptual conditions). This finding further supports the recent evidence of the spatial character of the canonical size phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.