ArticleScientific reports2025
A multigrained preference analysis method for product iterative design incorporating AI-generated review detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online reviews significantly influence consumer purchasing decisions and serve as a vital reference for product improvement. With the surge of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as ChatGPT, some merchants might exploit them to fabricate deceptive positive reviews, and competitors may also fabricate negative reviews to influence the opinions of consumers and designers. Attention must be paid to the trustworthiness of online reviews. In addition, the opinions expressed by users are limited, and design details hidden behind reviews also affect the product usage experience. Therefore, on the basis of integrated AI-generated review detection, a multigrained user preference analysis method is proposed in this work. The proposed method utilizes pre-trained language models and designs an authenticity detection model for online reviews. Subsequently, attribute-grained preference analysis is considered a text-filling problem and uses the text-infilling objective for domain-adaptive pretraining, facilitating knowledge transfer. On the basis of the feature selection algorithm, a calculation method for the importance of product design features is proposed by introducing a random idea. The proposed method analyzes user preferences at the granularity of product attributes and design features, enabling targeted cost control and optimization in product development and guiding design decisions. Rigorous comparative and few-shot experiments substantiate the superiority of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.