Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A multigrained preference analysis method for product iterative design incorporating AI-generated review detection.

Zhaojing Su, Mei Yang, Qingbo Zhai, Kaiyuan Guo, Yuexin Huang, Yangfan Cong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhaojing SuDepartment of Industrial Design, College of Arts, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tsingtao, 266590, China.
Mei YangDepartment of Industrial Design, College of Arts, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tsingtao, 266590, China. skdyangmei@163.com.
Qingbo ZhaiCollege of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tsingtao, 266590, China. Zhai0526@126.com.
Kaiyuan GuoDepartment of Industrial Design, College of Arts, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tsingtao, 266590, China.
Yuexin HuangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Industrial Design and Ergonomics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, China.
Yangfan CongKey Laboratory of Ministry of Industrial Design and Ergonomics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, China.

Funding

Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China 24YJCZH260Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2024QE211Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2024QG216Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province 23BLYJ04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online reviews significantly influence consumer purchasing decisions and serve as a vital reference for product improvement. With the surge of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as ChatGPT, some merchants might exploit them to fabricate deceptive positive reviews, and competitors may also fabricate negative reviews to influence the opinions of consumers and designers. Attention must be paid to the trustworthiness of online reviews. In addition, the opinions expressed by users are limited, and design details hidden behind reviews also affect the product usage experience. Therefore, on the basis of integrated AI-generated review detection, a multigrained user preference analysis method is proposed in this work. The proposed method utilizes pre-trained language models and designs an authenticity detection model for online reviews. Subsequently, attribute-grained preference analysis is considered a text-filling problem and uses the text-infilling objective for domain-adaptive pretraining, facilitating knowledge transfer. On the basis of the feature selection algorithm, a calculation method for the importance of product design features is proposed by introducing a random idea. The proposed method analyzes user preferences at the granularity of product attributes and design features, enabling targeted cost control and optimization in product development and guiding design decisions. Rigorous comparative and few-shot experiments substantiate the superiority of the proposed method.

Indexed as

AI-generated review detectionPretrained language modelProduct iterative designText fillingUser-generated contentUser preference analysis

Identifiers

PMID39833248
PMCPMC11747264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.