Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833224›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Asymmetric projection of introspection reveals a behavioural and neural mechanism for interindividual social coordination.

Kentaro Miyamoto, Caroline Harbison, Shiho Tanaka, Marina Saito, Shuyi Luo, Sara Matsui, Pranav Sankhe, Ali Mahmoodi, Mingming Lin, Nadescha Trudel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kentaro MiyamotoLaboratory for Imagination and Executive Functions, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan. kentaro.miyamoto.wg@riken.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1386-0045
Caroline Harbison *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3763-6865
Shiho Tanaka *Laboratory for Imagination and Executive Functions, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Marina SaitoLaboratory for Imagination and Executive Functions, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Shuyi LuoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sara MatsuiLaboratory for Imagination and Executive Functions, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Pranav SankheDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ali MahmoodiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mingming LinLaboratory for Imagination and Executive Functions, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Nadescha TrudelDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-3640
Nicholas SheaInstitute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, UK.
Matthew F S RushworthDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5578-9884

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) No. 681422 (MetCogCon)Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) Brain/MINDS2.0MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) DC1/PDMEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP22H00092MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP22K18665MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23H03843MEXT | RIKEN Junior Research AssociateRCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/P024955/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 221794/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we collaborate with others to tackle novel problems, we anticipate how they will perform their part of the task to coordinate behavior effectively. We might estimate how well someone else will perform by extrapolating from estimates of how well we ourselves would perform. This account predicts that our metacognitive model should make accurate predictions when projected onto people as good as, or worse than, us but not on those whose abilities exceed our own. We demonstrate just such a pattern and that it leads to worse coordination when working with people more skilled than ourselves. Metacognitive projection is associated with a specific activity pattern in anterior lateral prefrontal cortex (alPFC

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsMetacognitionPrefrontal CortexSocial BehaviorAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeTemporal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39833224
PMCPMC11747205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.