ArticleCell discovery2025
Generation of live mice from haploid ESCs with germline-DMR deletions or switch.
Article in Cell discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Gamete Production in Mammals: Decades of Pioneering Approaches in Germ Cell and Stem Cell Biology Supporting Innovative Discovery and Expansion of Human Reproductive Potential.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025Review
- Enhanced differentiation capacity of parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells via incorporation of non-growing oocyte genomes in mouse.American journal of stem cells · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is required for sexual reproduction and embryonic development of mammals, in which, differentially methylated regions (DMRs) regulate the parent-specific monoallelic expression of imprinted genes. Numerous studies on imprinted genes have highlighted their critical roles in development. However, what imprinting network is essential for development is still unclear. Here, we establish a stepwise system to reconstruct a development-related imprinting network, in which diploid embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are derived by fusing between parthenogenetic (PG)- and androgenetic (AG)-haploid embryonic stem cells (haESCs) with different DMR deletions (termed Ha-Ha-fusion system), followed by tetraploid complementation to produce all-haESC fetuses. Diploid ESCs fused between PG-haESCs carrying 8 maternally-derived DMR deletions and AG-haESCs with 2 paternally-derived DMR deletions give rise to live pups efficiently, among which, one lives to weaning. Strikingly, diploid ESCs derived from the fusion of PG-haESCs with 7 maternal DMR deletions and AG-haESCs with 2 paternal DMR deletions and maternal Snrpn-DMR deletion also support full-term embryonic development. Moreover, embryos reconstructed by injection of AG-haESCs with hypomethylated H19-DMR into oocytes with H19-DMR deletion develop into live mice sustaining inverted allelic gene expression. Together, our findings indicate that restoration of monoallelic expression of 10 imprinted regions is adequate for the full-term development of all-haESC pups, and it works irrespective of their parental origins. Meanwhile, Ha-Ha-fusion system provides a useful tool for deciphering imprinting regulation networks during embryonic development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.