ReviewMedicine2025
A narrative review of papilla preservation techniques in clinical dentistry.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injectable platelet-rich fibrin based interventions for treatment of gingival black triangles: systematic review of clinical evidence.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Review
- Inverted T-Shape Connective Tissue Graft for Interdental Papilla Reconstruction: A Clinical Case Series.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Treatment Planning in an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- A review on papilla preservation flap techniques.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Mucogingival Parameters of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Peruvian Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interdental papilla is closely associated with oral health and dental aesthetics. Interproximal papilla is an essential component of pink aesthetics as well as an indispensable prerequisite for the health of oral tissues. The loss of papillary height not only considerably affects final esthetic results, but also brings a series of periodontal complications. The deficiency of papilla can be induced by iatrogenic factors, particularly the flap technique, which is usually employed in oral surgeries. Therefore, preservation of the interdental papilla must be a consideration of flap designs. To avoid papilla defects secondary to conventional flaps, papilla-preserving flap designs have been widely studied in clinical practice. With numerous papilla preservation techniques (PPTs) increasingly being employed, not only is the postoperative pink aesthetic better maintained, but the predictability of surgical outcomes has been significantly enhanced. However, there is a lack of adequate literature that provides a comprehensive overview of PPTs in the field of dentistry. This review summarizes the latest developments in papilla preservation flap designs in the field of oral surgery, with a particular emphasis on their indications, limitations, incision characteristics, and clinical benefits. This review may provide optimal protocols for the personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.