ArticleMedicine2025
Fatal complications of aortoesophageal fistula caused by pseudoaneurysm following esophageal stent placement: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Penetrating aortic ulcer following endoscopic dilatation of esophageal anastomotic stenosis: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is an exceedingly rare yet critically life-threatening condition, with mortality rates nearing 100% if not addressed promptly. AEF often develops in the context of thoracic aortic aneurysms, esophageal malignancies, or as a complication of foreign body ingestion and prior thoracic aortic surgeries. This study reports an exceptionally severe and clinically rare case of AEF associated with a pseudaneurysm induced by esophageal stenting. By disseminating this case, we aim to heighten awareness of AEF and emphasize the necessity for meticulous decision-making during esophageal stent placement, along with the importance of vigilant postoperative monitoring to enable early intervention. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 70-year-old male presented with "food obstruction" and was subsequently diagnosed with esophageal malignancy. To alleviate the obstruction, he underwent esophageal stenting. Fifty-five days postprocedure, he experienced a sudden onset of "chest pain, vomiting of dark red blood, and melena," prompting hospitalization for "gastrointestinal bleeding." DIAGNOSES: Urgent computed tomography angiography revealed the emergence of a new pseudaneurysm at the lateral aspect of the esophageal stent, with direct communication between the aneurysm and the adjacent esophagus, raising the suspicion of AEF.
interventionsAn urgent multidisciplinary emergency team was convened to execute critical interventions, including endoluminal stenting of the esophagus and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. OUTCOMES: The patient suffered a sudden and massive hematemesis, estimated at approximately 3000 mL, leading to his subsequent demise. LESSONS: AEF is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients suspected of AEF, it is imperative to conduct prompt and thorough computed tomography angiography while initiating an emergency surgical alert. The proximity of esophageal stents to the aorta may significantly elevate the risk of AEF; thus, a comprehensive risk assessment should precede stent placement in cases involving tumors adjacent to the aorta. Furthermore, postoperative surveillance is crucial to monitor potential aortic invasion by the tumor or the development of an aneurysm near the esophagus, facilitating timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.