SynthesisMedicine2025
Efficacy and safety of ivermectin-albendazole combination versus ivermectin or albendazole monotherapy in soil-transmitted helminthiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined high-quality metagenomics reveals off-target effects of albendazole, ivermectin-albendazole and moxidectin-albendazole on the human gut bacteria.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoil-transmitted helminthiasis remains a daunting challenge to global health, exerting its greatest toll on resource-limited regions of the world. A dual drug approach using the co-administration of ivermectin and albendazole has shown promising results in comparison to the traditional monotherapy strategy. In light of this, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted.
methodsSeveral electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Embase were explored to search for relevant studies from inception to September 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Studies was utilized to evaluate the quality of studies.
resultsA total of 8 randomized controlled trials, reporting 10 patient populations, were included. The treatment of trichuriasis significantly favored the dual therapy regimen of ivermectin-albendazole over albendazole-only monotherapy (risk ratio [RR]: 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.66-4.93; P = .0002), with no significant differences observed for ascariasis and hookworm. The treatment of trichuriasis and hookworm significantly favored the dual therapy regimen of ivermectin-albendazole over ivermectin-only monotherapy (RR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.56-2.21; P < .00001 and RR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.23-4.31; P = .009, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between dual therapy and monotherapy in terms of adverse effects.
conclusionThese findings highlight the nuanced effectiveness of combined therapy specific to certain helminth types, in addition to their comparable safety profiles, thereby providing pivotal insights that contribute to the evolving landscape of soil-transmitted helminth treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.