ArticleBMJ open2025
Specialty choice among final-year medical students and house officers in Nigeria: implications for anaesthesia practice - a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Perceptions, and Career Interest in Anesthesiology among MBBS Students: Impact of an Operation Theater-only Elective.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of proclivity for anaesthesia as a career among medical students in a Southwestern Nigeria tertiary institution: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNigeria's doctor shortage is worsening with mass exodus and imbalanced specialty distribution. Anaesthesia faces particularly critical shortages. Medical graduate specialty choices have a vital impact on the workforce and are essential for healthcare planning. This study aimed to identify the current specialty preferences of final-year medical students and house officers in Nigeria, factors that affect such choices, and their implications for anaesthesia practice.
designWe conducted a cross-sectional study among final-year medical students and house officers in Nigeria using a self-administered, semistructured electronic questionnaire. The survey question was divided into four sections: sociodemographic data, specialty preferences, factors considered in choosing a specialty, perception of anaesthesia posting and anaesthesia as a specialty.
settingThe survey was delivered via a Google Form that had been active for 4.5 months.
participantsA total of 760 valid responses were received from final-year medical students and house officers in Nigeria. The majority (63.82%) of the participants were final-year medical students.
resultsSurgery (26.58%), internal medicine (14.47%) and obstetrics and gynaecology (14.34%) were the top-ranking specialty choices. Only 3.55% (eighth in ranking) intended to specialise in anaesthesia. There was a positive correlation between respondents' specialty choice and the specialty of their doctor role model. Passion/interest, flexibility, potential future income and job prospects were essential in choosing a specialty. Most decisions were made during clinical rotations (63.95%), and only 35.26% had career guidance. Many enjoyed their anaesthesia posting, but over half felt the exposure was inadequate.
conclusionsToo few medical graduates in Nigeria prefer anaesthesia as a specialty, and there is an urgent need to increase interest. A lack of career counselling, anaesthetist mentors and satisfactory clinical rotations are factors that can be improved for better recruitment into anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.