Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39832984›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to the emergency department: findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services.

Fiona C Sampson, Rachel O'Hara, Jaqui Long, Joanne Coster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona C SampsonThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK F.C.Sampson@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-0302
Rachel O'HaraThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-6854
Jaqui LongThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-6195
Joanne CosterThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-4222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrehospital notifications (pre-alerts) enable emergency department (ED) staff to prepare for the arrival of patients requiring a time-critical response. Effective communication of the pre-alert is key to enabling the ED to prepare appropriately, but evidence on communication practices is lacking. We undertook qualitative research to understand how pre-alert communication may be improved to optimise the ED response for pre-alerted patients. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsData collection took place within three UK Ambulance Services and six EDs between August 2022 and April 2023. We undertook semi-structured interviews with 34 ambulance and 40 ED staff and 156 hours non-participation observation of pre-alert practice (143 pre-alerts). Verbatim interview transcripts and observation notes were imported into NVivo and analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsWe identified significant variation in how pre-alerts were communicated that influenced how effectively information was transferred. Ambulance and ED staff demonstrated a shared recognition that pre-alerts need to be communicated concisely, but both received minimal training in how to give and receive pre-alerts. Efficient pre-alerting was influenced by clinician experience and seniority. ED and ambulance clinicians following different information-sharing formats sometimes led to interruptions, information loss and tensions, particularly when an early 'headline' clinical concern had not been shared. Ambulance clinicians sometimes questioned the appropriateness of their pre-alert when ED clinicians did not explain the rationale for not giving the expected response (that is, being accepted into a high-priority area of the ED). Additional sources of frustration included technological problems and poor communication of estimated time of arrival and caller/responder identities.

conclusionsUse of a shared format, including a headline 'cause for concern', may improve the clarity, usefulness and civility of pre-alerts, particularly when the clinician's concern is not obvious from observations. Basic training on how to undertake pre-alerts for both ED and ambulance clinicians may improve understanding of the importance of pre-alert communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12652860.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCommunicationEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEEmergency DepartmentsQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID39832984
PMCPMC11751996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.