ArticleBMJ open2025
To what extent do the prevalence of sickness presence and reasons for sickness presence vary between school classes in upper secondary schools? A cross-sectional survey in Trøndelag county, Norway.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis paper investigated sickness presence (SP) among students in academic upper secondary schools (USS). The research question asked was: To what extent do the prevalence of SP and reasons for SP vary between school classes in USS in Norway?
designA cross-sectional survey was done in the final year of USS. Multilevel modelling was used to estimate school class-level effects.
setting71 school classes from 13 Norwegian schools participated in the study in April 2018.
participants1955 students in academic education programmes were invited to participate in the survey, and 1511 completed it. The response rate was 77%. 58% of the respondents were female students. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the number of SP incidents and reasons for practising SP in school. The analysis examined factors that influenced the prevalence of and reasons for SP.
results54% of the students reported two or more incidents of SP. The primary reason for reporting SP was attendance pressure, including factors such as not wanting to exceed the absence limit (90%), concerns that high school absences could negatively affect grades (65%) or reduce chances of getting a job (61%). Some students reported positive reasons for SP, such as maintaining social connections (32%). Multilevel modelling indicated that the class-level effect on the prevalence of SP incidents and positive attendance reasons accounted for 5% of the variance. Some of the class-level effect was due to contextual factors (eg, student relations) and less was due to compositional factors (eg, gender distribution).
conclusionsThe study discovered significant variations in SP between school classes, suggesting that students' attitudes and behaviours towards SP can influence their peers. Moreover, attendance pressure factors for SP were more frequently reported than positive attendance factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.