ReviewAnalytica chimica acta2025
Emerging opportunities for intact and native protein analysis using chemical proteomics.
Review in Analytica chimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complexoform-restricted covalent TRMT112 ligands that allosterically agonize METTL5.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Methods for the Investigation of Protein-Ligands Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Integrating prior knowledge inference with computational multi-omics analysis to reveal host antiviral networks of natural compounds against influenza A virus.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical proteomics has advanced small molecule ligand discovery by providing insights into protein-ligand binding mechanism and enabling medicinal chemistry optimization of protein selectivity on a global scale. Mass spectrometry is the predominant analytical method for chemoproteomics, and various approaches have been deployed to investigate and target a rapidly growing number of protein classes and biological systems. Two methods, intact mass analysis (IMA) and top-down proteomics (TDMS), have gained interest in recent years due to advancements in high resolution mass spectrometry instrumentation. Both methods apply mass spectrometry analysis at the proteoform level, as opposed to the peptide level of bottom-up proteomics (BUMS), thus addressing some of the challenges of protein inference and incomplete information on modification stoichiometry. This Review covers recent research progress utilizing MS-based proteomics methods, discussing in detail the capabilities and opportunities for improvement of each method. Further, heightened attention is given to IMA and TDMS, highlighting these methods' strengths and considerations when utilized in chemoproteomic studies. Finally, we discuss the capabilities of native mass spectrometry (nMS) and ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) and how these methods can be used in chemoproteomics research to complement existing approaches to further advance the field of functional proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.