ArticleNeuropharmacology2025
Characterization of a novel oronasal-restricted nicotine vaping self-administration model in mice.
Article in Neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of commercial unflavored and vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine intake and withdrawal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Adolescent nicotine exposure affects later-life nicotine reward and withdrawal in mice.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2025Article
- Impact of chemical flavorants on reinforcement-related behavior in an adolescent mouse model of vaping self-administration.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nicotine use remains one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in the United States and, while the prevalence of combustible cigarette use has declined over the past few years, the popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems continues to rise. Vaping is not without risks, and its long-term effects, particularly in vulnerable populations, remain largely unknown. This study introduces a novel, oronasal-restricted, nicotine vapor self-administration mouse model to investigate the impact of nicotine concentration, genotype, sex, and age on self-administration and behavioral response to nicotine. Our studies show that male and female young adult mice respond to nicotine, demonstrating notable sex-related differences in intake, locomotor sensitization, and somatic withdrawal signs. In addition, we characterized intake in adolescent mice, showing sex differences as well. Finally, we showed genotype-related differences when using β2 knock-out mice, emphasizing the role of the β2 nAChR in nicotine reward and nicotine intake. This new model offers a more targeted approach to studying the potential risks of nicotine vaping in a more relevant and face-valid model compared to traditional whole-body nicotine vapor exposure in rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.