ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
An Inter- and Intra-Rater Agreement Assessment of Two Novel Classification Systems for Coronal Imbalance in Adult Scoliosis and Spine Deformity.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Harnessing Machine Learning, a Subset of Artificial Intelligence, for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCoronal malalignment is a common feature of adult spinal deformity, and accurate classification is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, variations in interpretation among clinicians can impact classification consistency. By assessing the reliability and applicability of these systems across different medical experts, this study seeks to establish a standardized approach to enhance clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement of two classification systems for coronal malalignment in adult spinal deformity patients, as proposed by Qiu et al. and Obeid et al.
methodsWe analyzed 70 cases of adult spinal deformity collected between January 1, 2010, and April 20, 2023, using the classification systems proposed by Qiu et al. and Obeid et al. To assess inter- and intra-rater agreement, the same group of researchers re-evaluated all cases in a random order after a 4-week interval. We used the kappa statistic (κ) for inter- and intra-rater agreement assessment.
resultsQiu's classification system: Inter-rater agreement: Substantial agreement (κ = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.72-0.80) for Type A, Type B, and Type C. Intra-rater agreement: Nearly perfect agreement (κ = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78-0.89) within raters for Type A, Type B, and Type C. Obeid's classification system: Inter-rater agreement: Almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.83-0.87) for Type 0, Type 1, and Type 2. Complete system: Substantial agreement (κ = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.71) for all types and subtypes. Intra-rater agreement: Almost perfect at the type level (κ = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83-0.93) and substantial at the subtype level (κ = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.85).
conclusionsThe research findings indicate a high level of agreement between the classification system described by Qiu et al. and the classification system proposed by Obeid et al. This agreement supports the widespread adoption and utilization of these classification systems in future clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.