ArticleActa orthopaedica2025
Curve progression in non-surgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a cohort study with 40-year follow-up.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating microRNA signatures for diagnosis and prediction of curve progression in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTreatment of idiopathic scoliosis in childhood aims to prevent curve progression. It is generally accepted that curves > 50° have the highest risk of progression, but less well described is what happens with mild to moderate curves. The aim of this study was to assess long-term curve progression and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and compare thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves.
methodsWe identified 177 patients diagnosed with a pediatric spinal deformity and treated at our institution from 1972 through 1983. 91 of 129 eligible patients with idiopathic scoliosis completed follow-up (71%). Patient files from treatment/observation in childhood were reviewed including detailed descriptions of radiographs. At follow-up we assessed long standing full-spine radiographs and HRQoL with the Scoliosis Research Society 22 revised questionnaire.
resultsMean follow-up was 41 years (standard deviation [SD] 2.5 years). 21 patients underwent surgery in adolescence or early adulthood leaving 70 patients for analysis of curve progression, of whom 61 had complete radiographs. For patients with a main curve < 25° at the end of treatment in adolescence (n = 19) mean curve progression was 7° (SD 9); for 25-40° curves (n = 26) 16° (SD 13); for 40-50° curves (n =10) 22° (SD 8); and for curves > 50° (n = 6) 17° (SD 6). There was a linear association between main curve size at follow-up and SRS-22r subtotal score (P = 0.003).
conclusionWe found substantial curve progression for patients with main curves > 25° at end of treatment, but with a considerable variation between patients. Curve progression was not associated with curve size at the end of treatment and did not differ significantly between thoracic and TL/L curves. Larger main curve size at follow-up was associated with lower HRQoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.