ReviewGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
Characterization of Tumor Antigens from Multi-omics Data: Computational Approaches and Resources.
Review in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for solid tumors in pediatric patients: current breakthroughs, dilemmas, and strategies.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Nanovaccines for lung cancer: Platforms, mechanistic insights, and translational challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Advances and Strategies in Enhancing mRNA Cancer Vaccines.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- mCancer communications (London, England) · 2025Article
- Computational methods and data resources for predicting tumor neoantigens.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Streaming Long-Read Sequence Alignments for HLA Predictions Using HLAminer.Current protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor-specific antigens, also known as neoantigens, have potential utility in anti-cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), neoantigen-specific T cell receptor-engineered T (TCR-T), chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T), and therapeutic cancer vaccines (TCVs). After recognizing presented neoantigens, the immune system becomes activated and triggers the death of tumor cells. Neoantigens may be derived from multiple origins, including somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, and gene fusions), circular RNAs, alternative splicing, RNA editing, and polymorphic microbiomes. An increasing amount of bioinformatics tools and algorithms are being developed to predict tumor neoantigens derived from different sources, which may require inputs from different multi-omics data. In addition, calculating the peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) affinity can aid in selecting putative neoantigens, as high binding affinities facilitate antigen presentation. Based on these approaches and previous experiments, many resources have been developed to reveal the landscape of tumor neoantigens across multiple cancer types. Herein, we summarize these tools, algorithms, and resources to provide an overview of computational analysis for neoantigen discovery and prioritization, as well as the future development of potential clinical utilities in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.